The State prosecuting counsel has blasted Oscar Pistorius’ lawyer’s
claim that sending the athlete to jail for the murder of ex-gf Reeva
Steenkamp will not serve any purpose.
In today’s hearing at Pretoria
High court, the defense counsel had argued that Pistorius was a broken
man and even told him to walk around the court without his prosthetic
legs for the judge to see the man the world wants to send to jail. But
prosecuting counsel, Gerrie Nel, in a series of explosive arguments,
argued that Pistoriusโ culpability instead borders on dolus directus โ
that is, the intention to kill.
with no escape for the person inside. He fired not one but four shots.
These are all aggravating circumstances and that even if he thought it
was an intruder, he armed himself with a firearm loaded with black talon
ammunition and says Pistorius has never given an โacceptable
explanationโ of why he fired four times.
argument that Pistorius thought the person behind the door was an
intruder does not make it a less serious crime. Does it detract from the
fact that he is a murderer?’
says the court should not impose a sentence less than the minimum
prescribed for murder, which is 15 yearsโ imprisonment saying the court
doesn’t start with a clean slate.
supervision โ essentially house arrest, which is what Pistorius has
been under since leaving prison last October โ is not even close to the
punishment required here”
says he has rarely heard such devastation from a family as that relayed
by Barry Steenkamp and Kim Martin in their testimony. He says the judge
has a duty to ensure:
the court has heard is that the accused elected to give an interview to
the TV but not take this court into his confidence. Thatโs
disrespectful to the court, Itโs disrespectful to the victims of this
crime, itโs disrespectful to the deceased.’
identity of the victim is irrelevant to his guilt and irrelevant to
sentence.He is guilty of the murder of Reeva. He killed her.’