‘There’s a difference between I’m very sorry Reeva is dead & I’m sorry for myself that Reeva is dead’ – Counsel blasts Oscar Pistorius

‘There’s a difference between I’m very sorry Reeva is dead & I’m sorry for myself that Reeva is dead’ – Counsel blasts Oscar Pistorius

by Joseph Anthony
94 views

The State prosecuting counsel has blasted Oscar Pistorius’ lawyer’s
claim that sending the athlete to jail for the murder of ex-gf Reeva
Steenkamp will not serve any purpose.

In today’s hearing at Pretoria
High court, the defense counsel had argued that Pistorius was a broken
man and even told him to walk around the court without his prosthetic
legs for the judge to see the man the world wants to send to jail. But
prosecuting counsel, Gerrie Nel, in a series of explosive arguments,
argued that Pistoriusโ€™ culpability instead borders on dolus directus โ€“
that is, the intention to kill.

 
He knew the toilet cubicle was small
with no escape for the person inside. He fired not one but four shots.
These are all aggravating circumstances and that even if he thought it
was an intruder, he armed himself with a firearm loaded with black talon
ammunition and says Pistorius has never given an โ€œacceptable
explanationโ€ of why he fired four times.
‘The
argument that Pistorius thought the person behind the door was an
intruder does not make it a less serious crime. Does it detract from the
fact that he is a murderer?’
‘I wonโ€™t deal with perceptions but with facts.’ Gerrie Nel, prosecuting counsel says.
‘If you want to talk about a broken man, he says, letโ€™s talk about Barry Steenkamp (Reeva’s dad).’
 ‘The defence says Pistorius has accepted the courtโ€™s findings of murder. That is not the same as accepting what he did,’
โ€œIsnโ€™t it time we now finally let the world see what this accused did with four black talon rounds through a door?โ€ Nel asks.
Nel then talks about Dr Scholtz testimony of Pistoriusโ€™ anxiety and depression.
‘So why did Pistorius hoard his medicine in his cell?
‘Scholtz also said he should be hospitalised, Yet no steps were taken to hospitalise him.’
‘It isnโ€™t plausible to say he is remorseful’
‘The only plausible explanation is that the accused armed himself with the intention to shoot.’
Nel
says the court should not impose a sentence less than the minimum
prescribed for murder, which is 15 yearsโ€™ imprisonment saying the court
doesn’t start with a clean slate.
”There must be โ€œtruly convincing reasons for a different responseโ€, he adds, reading from the regulations.
‘Undue sympathy is not an aspect that should be taken into consideration’
”Correctional
supervision โ€“ essentially house arrest, which is what Pistorius has
been under since leaving prison last October โ€“ is not even close to the
punishment required here”
โ€œWholly suspendingโ€ a prison sentence, even in compelling circumstances, is not permitted.”
‘Pity will play no role in a sentence, the court canโ€™t be seen to condone serious crime,’ he adds.
‘Itโ€™s not a clean slate. The minimum sentencing is applicable.’
Justice must still be properly administered โ€ฆ despite an admission of forgiveness.
Forgiveness has more to do with the person forgiving than with the crime.
The deceased has done nothing wrong โ€ฆ She will never walk again โ€ฆ The accused murdered her.
Nel
says he has rarely heard such devastation from a family as that relayed
by Barry Steenkamp and Kim Martin in their testimony. He says the judge
has a duty to ensure:
‘The court will never be lenient on any crime that caused that grief.’
‘What
the court has heard is that the accused elected to give an interview to
the TV but not take this court into his confidence. Thatโ€™s
disrespectful to the court, Itโ€™s disrespectful to the victims of this
crime, itโ€™s disrespectful to the deceased.’
‘I caused her death is not the same as I murdered her. Without that, there can be no remorse.’
‘What motivated him? We donโ€™t know.’
‘I cannot think of a more excessive use of a firearm โ€ฆ He fired four shots that tore up the body of the deceased.’
‘Is an intruderโ€™s life not important? Did he think of that life?’
‘Reeva Steenkamp disappeared in this trial’, he says. 
‘The court should take into account โ€œwho she was โ€ฆ what dreams she hadโ€.
‘She is just as important as the personal circumstances of the accused โ€ฆ She can never walk in court.’
‘The
identity of the victim is irrelevant to his guilt and irrelevant to
sentence.He is guilty of the murder of Reeva. He killed her.’
โ€œThere is a difference between I am very sorry Reeva is dead and I am sorry for myself that Reeva is dead,โ€ Nel Argued.
Sentencing of Oscar Pistorius is likely to happen on Friday.
Source: Guardian UK

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Chijos News is an independent online publication that provides readers with the latest breaking Nigerian news, world news, entertainment, sports, business, and many more.

@2024 – Chijosnews.com. All Rights Reserved.

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00