The Court of Appeal in Abuja has reversed the discharge and acquittal of former Group Managing Director of the Nigerian Air Force (NAF) Holding Company and Air Force Commanding, Training Command, Air Vice Marshal Alkali Mohammadu Mamu on corruption charges by Justice Salisu Garba of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).
The three-man panel of the Court of Appeal, in a unanimous judgment on July 15, 2020, convicted and sentenced Mamu to two yearsโ imprisonment in respect of one, out of the four counts, in a charge marked: FCT/HC/CR/182/2016 on which he was tried by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).
The appellate court acquitted him on three other counts โ one, three and four โ on the grounds that the prosecution failed to prove those counts.
Mamu was convicted on count two, in which he was found to have โcorruptlyโ accepted a gift of $300,000, through Kalli Fertilizer Company (a firm owned by his daughters) from Himma Abubakar, owner of Societe Dโ Equipment International Nig. Ltd (SEI Nig Ltd), a company engaged to supply military equipment to NAF, under Mamuโs supervision.
In the lead judgment, on the appeal marked: CA/A/788c/2018, Justice Yargata Byenchit Nimpar, however, gave Mamu an option of N500, 000 fine.
Mamu was one of the senior military officers accused of abusing their positions by the Presidential Committee on the Audit of Defence Equipment Procurement (CADEP), which was mandated to look into contracts awarded for military procurements.
The EFCC filed a four-count charge against Mamu in 2016 and on which he was tried before the High Court of the FCT, following which Justice Garba, in a judgment on June 29, 2018, discarded and acquitted him on all four counts and held among others, that the prosecution failed to prove its case, a decision EFCCโs lawyer, Sylvanus Tahir appealed.
Justice Nimpar faulted the trial courtโs rejection of the confessional statement made to investigators by Mamu, which the prosecution tendered in evidence at trial, noting that โthe trial court failed in its duty by applying principles of law in a flawed manner, leading to the striking out of the confessional statement.
โHe (the trial judge) erred. There was no legal basis for that action. Considering the evidence before the court, there was corroboration for the confessional statement particularly, the SEI Ltdโs payment for the cars, to the fertilizer company in which his (Mamuโs) daughters are directors and bank documents.
โI find the confessional statement good to be evaluated for weight. I therefore disagree with the trial judge and find that the confessional statement was properly in evidence and must be evaluated along other pieces of evidence before the court.
โThe sum of $300,000 was not legitimate income from his (Mamuโs) employers. Mr. Himma Abubakar was not respondentโs employer and had no business paying the respondent any sum as appreciation. This is coming at the backdrop of the admission by the respondent that he got more than he was allegedly entitled to.
โOn count two, I find for the appellant that it proved the allegation beyond reasonable doubt. I find the respondent guilty on count two. On counts one, three and four, there was no direct admission and even though it was established that the respondents got cars paid for by SEI Nig Ltd (Himma Abubakar) and delivered by Coscharis.
โFlowing from above therefore, the respondent is discharged and acquitted on counts one, three and four of the charge, but guilty of count two.
โConsidering the circumstances and the facts in this appeal, particularly the fact that the respondent quickly refunded the sum of $300.000, there is no history of previous conviction before the court. Therefore, in exercise of the courtโs discretion, the respondent is hereby sentenced to two yearsโ imprisonment and in the alternative, an option of N500, 000 fine,โ Justice Nimpar said.
Also on the panel were Justices Abdu Aboki and Emmanuel Akomaye Agim.
