 |
| Peter Nwaoboshi |
A Senator representing Delta North senatorial district, Peter Nwaoboshi as prayed a Federal High Court in Abuja to set aside its orders freezing his accounts in four banks.
The court had, on July 2, 2019, upon an ex-parte motion filed the Special Presidential Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property (โSPIPโ) on behalf of the Federal Government, and granted the order for interim attachment of the accounts in Zenith, Access, UBA and Sterling banks.
Nwaoboshi, in a motion on notice, filed on July 11, 2019, brought to the attention of the court on Wednesday by his lawyer, Robert Clarke (SAN) is also challenging the courtโs jurisdiction to further grant audience to the SPIP in relation to is assets.
The Senatorโs prayers, as contained in the motion, include โAn order setting aside and/or annulling, ex-debito justitiae (as a matter of right) the interim forfeiture and restraining orders made in this suit on the 2nd July, 2019 suit by this honourable court pursuant to the amended motion ex-parte dated the 22nd November, 2018.
โAn order indemnifying the applicant by the complainant/ respondent to the full extent of the loss and damages suffered by the applicant by reason of the said ex-parte interim forfeiture and restraining orders from the 6th July, 2019 in the sum of N50million.โ
He is contending that the SPIP made false claim in obtaining the orders.
The Senator stated: โThe suit said to have been filed in the name of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and purportedly by the Attorney-General of the Federation, and the ex-parte interim forfeiture and restraining orders sought and obtained therein, was so filed and obtained by the Special Presidential Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property (โSPIPโ) in the absence of any lawful authority.
โBy the decision in Tumsah v. FRN (2018) 17 NWLR (Pt. 1648) 238, the SPIP is lacks the competence to institute this Suit and to seek and obtain the said ex-parte interim forfeiture and restraining orders, and this honourable court is thereby divested of the jurisdiction to entertain the suit and/or grant the said ex-parte orders.
โThe interim forfeiture and restraining orders were sought obtained upon deliberate suppression and/or misrepresentation of facts and with the utmost bad faith.
โThe institution of this suit and the filing of the said motion ex-parte for interim forfeiture and restraining orders constitute a grievous abuse of the judicial process.
When the case was called on Wednesday, lawyer to the SPIP, Oluwatosin Ojaomo said his client was not yet served with the Senatorโs motion.
Another lawyer, Sylvanus Maliki, who said he represented an interested part โ Mrs. Ngozi Veronica Aniezu โ said he has also filed a motion.
Upon Ojaomoโs observation that he was also not served with the motion by Maliki, Justice Taiwo Taiwo directed that the motions by Nwaoboshi and Maliki be served on the SPIP lawyer in court.
Clarke had told the court that his clientโs motion was earlier served on the office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF).
But, upon the judgeโs directive, Ojaomo accepted service of the documents, following which Justice Taiwo adjourned until August 16, 2019 for hearing.
The judge directed Ojaomo to ensure that he respond to all the motions served on him, particularly that by Nwaoboshi, challenging the courtโs jurisdiction.
