Film review: All the Money in the World ***

Film review: All the Money in the World ***

by Joseph Anthony
115 views

We need to talk about Kevin Spacey, who starred in All the Money in the World until allegations of sexual misconduct were made against him, whereupon his performance was expunged and his scenes re-shot with Christopher Plummer. Itโ€™s shocking that an actorโ€™s work โ€“ his creative life โ€“ can be destroyed for something he did in his private life. Itโ€™s shocking that so much creative effort can be squandered so casually. That said, I suspect โ€“ even beyond the bad publicity Spaceyโ€™s presence wouldโ€™ve attached to the project โ€“ that director Ridley Scott saw an opportunity in the actorโ€™s disgrace, and indeed heโ€™s admitted that Plummer was originally his first choice for the role (the studio wanted a bigger name). I donโ€™t care how politically correct you are, nobody re-fashions their entire movie at the last minute unless theyโ€™re convinced itโ€™ll work.

The switch may have been a good idea. I assume the Spacey footage will turn up eventually, if/when the furore over his sexual indiscretions dies down โ€“ but Spacey has a naturally sardonic presence whereas 87-year-old Plummer, though equally cold, is more of a canny bad-grandpa figure. Thereโ€™s a scene where he tells right-hand man Fletcher Chase (Mark Wahlberg) that he loves his grandson โ€“ and the words mightโ€™ve seemed less convincing in Spaceyโ€™s mouth, if only because Plummer is older and innately more vulnerable. Not that the old man goes soft, however: his love for 16-year-old John Paul Getty III (Charlie Plummer, no relation) is obviously a twisted, narcissistic kind of love, and of course it can never be allowed to obscure โ€œthe value of a dollarโ€.

Plummer Sr. is John Paul Getty Sr., the worldโ€™s richest man, whose grandson is kidnapped in Italy and held for a $17 million ransom (this really happened, in 1973). Getty, an oilman, was the first billionaire in human history, though heโ€™s not entirely sure how much money he has: โ€œIf you can count your money,โ€ he quips, โ€œyouโ€™re not a billionaireโ€. (This is an actual quote, Getty having apparently had a sharper sense of humour than the likes of Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos; itโ€™s not in the movie, but he once defined his formula for success as โ€œrise early, work late, and strike oilโ€!) Getty is also frugal โ€“ or just a bastard โ€“ and refuses to pay the ransom, especially since heโ€™s estranged from his grandson and daughter-in-law Gail (Michelle Williams). I have 14 grandchildren, he reasons, using the same self-serving logic he employs to fend off all pleas for money, however desperate; if I start paying ransoms, Iโ€™ll end up with 14 kidnapped grandchildren. โ€œForgive us,โ€ sighs the boy, addressing the audience in a brief, unexplained voice-over. โ€œItโ€™s like weโ€™re from another planetโ€.

โ€˜Weโ€™, of course, are the super-rich, which is also the filmโ€™s true subject โ€“ the rich being different, unlike us mere mortals. Gail isnโ€™t rich, quite the opposite; and Fletcher, sent by Getty to help out, is a regular guy, almost to a fault (this is one of Wahlbergโ€™s most anonymous performances). Getty is by far the juiciest role here: canny, duplicitous when it suits him, hunched over a telex machine perusing strips of paper with the latest stock prices. His passions are money and, surprisingly, family โ€“ but not in a tender way, just a clannish pride in being โ€œa Gettyโ€. โ€œThose children are my blood, and she took them!โ€ he rages, โ€˜sheโ€™ being Gail; his motive for refusing to pay turns out to be resentment โ€“ and perhaps a dose of self-loathing, since he agreed to grant Gail full custody in exchange for a cheaper divorce. She knew heโ€™d put money over family, and he canโ€™t forgive her for knowing that.

Thatโ€™s a smart psychological insight โ€“ albeit probably the only one in the whole movie. None of the other characters are very interesting, though Williams is subtle and young Plummer, from the upcoming Lean on Pete, is a strikingly androgynous presence. Gettyโ€™s odiousness was never going to get much nuance, given populist anger against the โ€˜one per centโ€™: โ€œYou greedy animals! You are the worst criminals of all!โ€ cries the chief kidnapper, speaking (more or less) for the whole movie. Worst of all, this is a story that stalls and stays stalled: Getty wonโ€™t pay, Gail is out of ideas, and Ridley Scott offers only misdirection โ€“ we think the kid is dead, but heโ€™s not โ€“ and glimpses of lifestyle porn.

Still, the details are enjoyable. Tight-fisted Getty has a red telephone box installed in his home, for guests to make phone calls (the butler is happy to supply change). Getty, in a gorgeous snow-flecked flashback, claims to be the modern reincarnation of the Emperor Hadrian. Scott makes good-looking movies; more to the point, after 45 years in the business, it seems he can make movies effortlessly, re-shooting major chunks with a different actor without the joins showing. Is this proof of his genius โ€“ or something else altogether, an old manโ€™s heartlessness perhaps, making films with such mechanical skill he can easily make the same film twice? Or was the Kevin Spacey version wildly different? Weโ€™ll never know.

DIRECTED BY Ridley Scott

STARRING Mark Wahlberg, Michelle Williams, Christopher Plummer

DRAMA

US 2017                         132 mins

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Chijos News is an independent online publication that provides readers with the latest breaking Nigerian news, world news, entertainment, sports, business, and many more.

@2024 – Chijosnews.com. All Rights Reserved.

-
00:00
00:00
Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00